Prediction of Roland Stuurman [] vs Ki Lung Ng [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W L W W L
Form
W L L W L W W L L LHead-To-Head: Stuurman 0 - 0 Ng
They have played 0 sets in total, with Stuurman winning 0 and Ng winning 0. The last match between Stuurman and Ng was at the M15 Monastir, 19-01-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Roland Stuurman getting the victory w/o.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Roland Stuurman | 0 |
| Ki Lung Ng | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Roland Stuurman vs Ki Lung Ng Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Stuurman 0 - 0 Ng
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stuurman has won 40.64% of points on their second serve, while Ng has won 47.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stuurman, in recent form, has won 52.23% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ng has won 42.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.66% and 21.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stuurman has saved 49.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ng has saved 52.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stuurman has won 60.42% of matches played (W/L 29/ 19), with Ng winning 42.42% (W/L 14/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stuurman has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 56/ 61). Ng has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 39/ 52), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Stuurman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19), where as Ng has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.16% of matches (W/L 14/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stuurman has played against opponents with an average rank of 25.96 while Ng has played against players with an average rank of 42.55.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stuurman has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ng has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stuurman has converted 27.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ng has converted 26.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Roland Stuurman vs Ki Lung Ng Best Odds For The Match
Roland Stuurman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Yousef Khamis
Player
Roland Stuurman
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 7-6(4) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Jadoun
Player
Roland Stuurman
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 5-7 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Roland Stuurman
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 4-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Ki Lung Ng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Ki Lung Ng
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliaksandr Liaonenka
Player
Ki Lung Ng
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ki Lung Ng
Player
Jack Cheng
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
40%
(
23 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-2 12-10 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ki Lung Ng
Player
Tsihon Fedorov
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yongming Zhang
Player
Ki Lung Ng
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ki Lung Ng
Player
Zi Hui Chen
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hannestad
Player
Ki Lung Ng
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Stuurman vs Ng?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Stuurman Vs Ng is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (130/111) | Win/Loss | 42% (41/56) |
| 54% (293/254) | Sets Win/Loss | 42% (90/122) |
| 52% (2765/2551) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (988/1053) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 150 | Aces Total | 110 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 382 | Total Double Faults | 122 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 56.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 69.16 |
| 68% (4359/6415) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1594/2623) |
| 61% (2645/4359) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1012/1594) |
| 44% (898/2056) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (468/1029) |
| 44% (270/609) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (97/249) |
| 41% (2510/6122) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1013/2621) |
| 53% (127/238) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (41/96) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (19/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 30% (3/10) |
| 46% (32/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (11/19) |
| 84% (134/112) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (38/31) |
| 16% (134/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (38/6) |
| 16% (106/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (59/10) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
